Non Disparagement Employment Agreement Template for New Zealand
Generate a bespoke document
What is a Non Disparagement Employment Agreement?
The Non Disparagement Employment Agreement is typically implemented in New Zealand employment relationships where protecting organizational reputation is crucial. It is commonly used when onboarding new employees or during employment contract updates, particularly in sensitive positions or public-facing roles. The agreement must comply with New Zealand's employment law framework, including the Employment Relations Act 2000 and Protected Disclosures Act 2022. While protecting the employer's interests, it must maintain employees' rights to raise legitimate grievances, make protected disclosures, and participate in legal proceedings. The document typically includes specific definitions of disparagement, scope of prohibited communications, permitted exceptions, and enforcement mechanisms.
Trusted by high-performance teams
Frequently Asked Questions
Are non-disparagement employment agreements legally enforceable in New Zealand?
Yes, non-disparagement employment agreements are legally enforceable in New Zealand when properly drafted and comply with the Employment Relations Act 2000. The agreement must be reasonable in scope, protect legitimate business interests, and not unreasonably restrict an employee's freedom of expression. Courts will assess whether the restrictions are proportionate and necessary for protecting the employer's reputation.
Can my employer enforce a non-disparagement clause if my employment contract is missing one?
No, your employer cannot enforce non-disparagement obligations that aren't explicitly included in your employment agreement or a separate signed document. Under New Zealand employment law, all terms and conditions must be clearly stated and agreed upon. However, you may still have implied duties of good faith and loyalty during employment under the Employment Relations Act 2000.
Does a non-disparagement agreement violate my freedom of speech rights in New Zealand?
A properly drafted non-disparagement agreement should not violate your freedom of expression rights under the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990. The restrictions must be reasonable, specific, and protect legitimate business interests. The agreement cannot prevent you from making protected disclosures under the Protected Disclosures Act 2022 or participating in legal proceedings.
How is a non-disparagement agreement different from a confidentiality agreement in New Zealand employment?
A non-disparagement agreement specifically prevents negative public statements about the employer, while a confidentiality agreement protects sensitive business information from disclosure. Non-disparagement clauses focus on reputation protection and typically continue after employment ends, whereas confidentiality agreements primarily protect trade secrets and proprietary information. Both serve different purposes and are often used together in employment contracts.
How long does it typically take to create a non-disparagement employment agreement in New Zealand?
Creating a basic non-disparagement agreement typically takes 1-2 weeks when using a lawyer, including drafting, review, and revisions. Using a template can reduce this to a few days, but you should still allow time for legal review to ensure compliance with New Zealand employment law. Complex agreements with multiple parties or specific industry requirements may take 3-4 weeks to finalize.
What are the most common mistakes employers make with non-disparagement agreements in New Zealand?
Common mistakes include making restrictions too broad or vague, failing to define what constitutes 'disparagement', and not allowing for protected disclosures under New Zealand law. Employers also often forget to ensure the agreement complies with good faith obligations under the Employment Relations Act 2000 and fail to provide adequate consideration for post-employment restrictions.
Can a non-disparagement agreement prevent me from leaving negative online reviews about my former employer in New Zealand?
A well-drafted non-disparagement agreement can restrict you from posting negative reviews online about your former employer, including on social media or review websites. However, the restriction must be reasonable and cannot prevent you from making factual statements in legal proceedings or protected disclosures. The agreement should specify what platforms and types of communications are covered.
About the Non Disparagement Employment Agreement
A non disparagement employment agreement is a legal contract that prevents employees from making negative or harmful statements about their employer, colleagues, or the organization's business operations. Under New Zealand law, these agreements must carefully balance employer reputation protection with fundamental employee rights, including freedom of expression guaranteed by the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990 and whistleblower protections under the Protected Disclosures Act 2022.
When do you need this document?
You need a non disparagement agreement when hiring employees in sensitive roles where negative publicity could significantly impact your business operations. This includes senior executives, public relations staff, sales representatives with client contact, and employees with access to confidential business information. The agreement is particularly important during employment transitions, such as onboarding new staff or updating existing employment contracts, especially in industries like media, finance, healthcare, or technology where reputation damage can have severe commercial consequences.
Key legal considerations
Your non disparagement agreement must include precise definitions of what constitutes disparaging conduct while preserving essential employee rights. The agreement should clearly specify prohibited communications, including social media posts, public statements, and discussions with competitors or media. However, it must explicitly protect employees' rights to raise legitimate workplace grievances through proper channels, make protected disclosures about illegal activities, participate in legal proceedings, and provide truthful testimony when legally required. The enforcement mechanisms should be proportionate and reasonable, avoiding overly broad restrictions that could be deemed unenforceable. Consider including mutual obligations where appropriate, requiring the employer to also refrain from disparaging the employee.
Legal requirements in New Zealand
Under the Employment Relations Act 2000, your agreement must comply with good faith employment principles and cannot unreasonably restrict an employee's ability to raise legitimate concerns about workplace conditions or safety. The Human Rights Act 1993 requires that restrictions do not discriminate based on protected characteristics or unduly limit fundamental rights. Your agreement must align with the Privacy Act 2020 if it involves personal information handling or disclosure provisions. The duration of post-employment obligations should be reasonable and justified by legitimate business interests. Courts will scrutinize overly broad or indefinite restrictions that could constitute restraint of trade. Ensure the agreement includes clear exceptions for legally mandated disclosures, participation in regulatory investigations, and protected whistleblowing activities under New Zealand legislation.
GOVERNING LAW
Applicable law
This Non Disparagement Employment Agreement is drafted to comply with New Zealand law. Key legislation includes:
Human Rights Act 1993: Ensures the agreement doesn't discriminate and protects fundamental human rights, including freedom of expression within reasonable limits
Privacy Act 2020: Governs how personal information is handled and protected, relevant for any provisions discussing the sharing or disclosure of information
Defamation Act 1992: Provides the legal framework for what constitutes defamation, which is relevant for defining the scope of disparaging statements
New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990: Protects freedom of expression rights, which must be balanced against non-disparagement obligations
Fair Trading Act 1986: Ensures that any restrictions on statements about the company don't prevent disclosure of truthful information that might be required by law or regulatory compliance
Protected Disclosures (Protection of Whistleblowers) Act 2022: Ensures the non-disparagement agreement doesn't prevent protected whistleblowing activities or legitimate complaints to regulatory authorities
Explore 208,390+ legal templates
Explore 208,390+ legal templates
Genie's Security Promise
Genie is the safest place to draft. Here's how we prioritise your privacy and security.
Your data is private:
We do not train on your data; Genie's AI improves independently
All data stored on Genie is private to your organisation
Your documents are protected:
Your documents are protected by ultra-secure 256-bit encryption
We are ISO27001 certified, so your data is secure
Organizational security:
You retain IP ownership of your documents and their information
You have full control over your data and who gets to see it

