Define: Institution's Results
In a research collaboration agreement, Institution's Results means all Results generated under the project that are not the Collaborator's Results, and that are not so closely tied to the Institution's own Background, Materials, or Confidential Information that ownership must stay with the Institution. It is a residual, allocation-defining category used to split outputs between the parties.
Legal accuracy standard set & glossary spot-checked by Imad Mohammed Nazar , Skadden-trained M&A lawyer, Legal Engineer at GenieAI
What Institution's Results Means in a Contract
Institution's Results is a defined term used in collaborative research and development arrangements, most commonly in agreements between a commercial partner and a university, hospital, or public research body. It identifies which of the Results produced during a joint project belong, by default, to the Institution rather than to the Collaborator. The term operates as a sorting mechanism: everything generated under the collaboration is a Result, and the contract then divides those Results into categories such as Collaborator's Results, Joint Results, and Institution's Results, each carrying different ownership, licensing, and publication consequences.
The defining feature of Institution's Results is that it is expressed largely by exclusion. Rather than listing positively what counts, the clause typically states that Institution's Results are Results that are not the Collaborator's Results, and are also not Results that relate directly to the composition, characteristics, manufacture, development, enhancement, or use of the Institution's own Background, Materials, or Confidential Information carved out separately. This layered exclusion reflects a deliberate drafting choice to protect the Institution's pre-existing knowledge and materials while still allowing genuinely new, jointly funded outputs to be allocated fairly between the parties.
How Institution's Results Is Defined or Measured
Because Institution's Results is a negative or residual category, it is measured by testing each Result against a sequence of exclusions rather than a positive checklist. The first test asks whether the Result falls within the definition of Collaborator's Results, which is usually results arising from the Collaborator's own inputs or falling within its predefined field of interest. If it does, it is excluded from Institution's Results. The second test asks whether the Result is directly related to the Institution's Background, Materials, or Confidential Information, meaning it concerns their composition, characteristics, manufacture, development, enhancement, or use. If so, it is treated separately, often remaining Institution property regardless of who generated it.
What remains after both exclusions have been applied constitutes Institution's Results. In practice this often includes Results that arise incidentally from the collaboration but do not touch the Collaborator's field of interest and do not implicate the Institution's proprietary inputs. Agreements sometimes leave a placeholder for the parties to insert a further, project-specific description of Results the Institution wishes to retain, which allows the definition to be tailored to the particular field of science, technology, or scholarship involved.
- Results generated using the Institution's own equipment or expertise unrelated to Collaborator inputs
- Improvements to general research techniques not tied to the Collaborator's specific materials
- Findings falling outside the Collaborator's defined field of interest under the agreement
Where Institution's Results Appears in Agreements
The term is most frequently found in research collaboration agreements, sponsored research agreements, and material transfer arrangements, and it appears prominently in templates built around a Relevant Circumstances
Relevant Sectors