What is a Sub Licence Agreement?
A sub-licence agreement allows a Canadian licensee to grant a third party permission to use intellectual property under a head licence, passing defined rights downstream without transferring ownership. Because the sub-licensee's rights depend entirely on the head licence remaining in force, the agreement must address what happens if that licence is terminated or the licensor becomes insolvent. Each layer of sub-licensing requires express authorisation from the rights-holder.
About the Sub Licence Agreement
A Sub Licence Agreement is a legal contract that allows you, as the original licensee of intellectual property, to grant specific usage rights to third parties while maintaining your obligations under the head license. Under United States federal law, this document must comply with multiple regulatory frameworks including the Copyright Act of 1976, Patent Act, and Lanham Act, depending on the type of intellectual property involved.
When do you need this document?
You'll need a Sub Licence Agreement when you hold licensed rights to intellectual property and want to extend those rights to additional parties. This commonly occurs in technology licensing where you've licensed software or patents and need to sublicense to distributors or resellers. Manufacturing companies often use sub-licensing when they've licensed production rights but need local partners in different territories. Entertainment and media companies frequently sublicense content rights to streaming platforms or regional distributors. The agreement is also essential in franchise-like arrangements where you've licensed a brand or business model and want to grant similar rights to others.
Key legal considerations
Your sub-licensing arrangement must not exceed the scope of rights granted in your original head license. You need explicit sublicensing authority from the head licensor, and any restrictions in the head license automatically apply to your sublicenses. Quality control provisions are crucial to maintain brand standards and protect the head licensor's interests. Payment structures must be clearly defined, including how royalties flow between all parties. Termination clauses should address what happens if either the head license or sub-license ends, including obligations to cease use and return materials. You must also consider antitrust implications under the Sherman Act to ensure your sublicensing doesn't create unfair market restrictions.
Legal requirements in United States
Under US federal law, your Sub Licence Agreement must comply with specific intellectual property statutes depending on what you're licensing. For copyrighted materials, the Copyright Act governs the scope and duration of rights you can sublicense. Patent sublicenses must adhere to Patent Act requirements, including proper notice provisions and limitation periods. If trademarks are involved, Lanham Act compliance is essential to maintain trademark protection and avoid abandonment. The Federal Trade Commission Act may apply if your sublicensing affects consumer markets, requiring disclosure of material terms. Some states have additional requirements for certain types of licensing arrangements, particularly those involving trade secrets or confidential information. You should also ensure your agreement includes proper choice of law and jurisdiction clauses to establish which courts will handle any disputes.
Governing law
Applicable law
This Sub Licence Agreement is drafted to comply with Canada law. Key legislation includes:
- Copyright Act (Canada): A sub-licence under Canadian copyright law is only valid if the head licence expressly permits it, since the Copyright Act does not grant sub-licensing rights by default. Any sub-licence that exceeds the rights granted in the head licence is void as against the original rights-holder.
- Trade-marks Act (Canada): Sub-licences of trade marks must preserve the licensor's quality control obligation under the Act, or the mark risks invalidity. Each layer of sublicensing must maintain a clear control chain back to the registered owner.
- Patent Act (Canada): Sub-licences of patented technology require authority from the patent owner and cannot extend beyond the rights and term of the head licence. Breach of a head licence that terminates it can extinguish all downstream sub-licences.
- Competition Act (Canada): Sub-licensing arrangements that restrict competition beyond what is reasonably necessary to protect the intellectual property right may attract scrutiny under the Competition Act's abuse-of-dominance or conspiracy provisions.
- Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act (PIPEDA): Where sub-licensed software or platforms process personal data, PIPEDA obligations flow through to sub-licensees, and data processing terms must be included in the sub-licence.
- Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (Canada): Insolvency of the head licensor or head licensee can affect sub-licences; sub-licensees should consider registration and protective provisions to preserve their rights in an insolvency scenario.