GenieAI vs ThoughtRiver

These two tools solve different shapes of contract problem. The questions below tell you which one you have.

Questions worth asking before you choose

• Do you need to draft, edit and negotiate contracts inside one platform, or only assess incoming third-party paper for risk? If you need drafting, editing and clause-by-clause negotiation in one place, choose GenieAI. If your sole job is triaging inbound paper for risk at high volume, ThoughtRiver is built for that.
• How much of your team's day is spent collaborating on redlines and turning documents around versus reading contracts a supplier sent you? If your team lives in redlines and multi-party turnarounds, choose GenieAI for its real-time collaboration and clause-level editing. If the work is predominantly one-directional risk screening, ThoughtRiver fits that shape.
• Do you want clause-level red/amber/green flagging plus built-in legal research while you work, or a standalone risk-scoring engine feeding your process? For clause-specific flagging and in-document legal research, choose GenieAI. If you want a dedicated risk-assessment engine to slot into an existing intake workflow, ThoughtRiver is designed for that.

Choose GenieAI if

• Review needs to be actionable by the business, not just accurate. GenieAI rates clauses red, amber or green against your own positions, so a commercial lead can see what to challenge without waiting for a lawyer to interpret it.
• You want the whole contract in one place, whether or not you draft today. GenieAI covers review and negotiation and drafting. Many teams start with review alone and add drafting later.
• Your team works in Word. The Word add-in puts review and drafting where the documents already live, with styling and numbering intact.
• A commercial, procurement or operations lead is doing the work, not a lawyer.
• You run project-based work where value concentrates in a few large agreements, as in construction, energy, mining, technology and real estate. A single missed indemnity or variation clause costs more than the whole review process.
• Where contract data sits matters. GenieAI is ISO/IEC 27001:2022 certified, set out on our security page.

Consider ThoughtRiver if

• ThoughtRiver is genuinely built for high-volume, one-directional risk triage of inbound third-party contracts, scoring incoming paper against your risk positions before a human ever opens it.

Where GenieAI is not the answer

• You are a law firm delivering billable client matters. GenieAI is built for the legal work a business does on its own contracts, including a firm's own commercial paperwork. It is not a matter-management or client-delivery tool.
• If your entire remit is automated pre-signature risk screening of large inbound contract queues, with no need to draft, edit, negotiate or collaborate on documents, then a dedicated risk-triage engine like ThoughtRiver is a closer fit than a full end-to-end platform.

Which alternative fits depends less on the feature list than on who is blocked.

Best for commercial and sales teams

The bottleneck is legal review time on standard sales agreements. GenieAI lets the commercial team draft and send inside guardrails legal sets, so legal sees the exceptions rather than everything.

Best for in-house legal

The bottleneck is routine volume reaching a small team. Teams at this stage typically compare GenieAI, ThoughtRiver, Luminance, LinkSquares. The deciding question is usually whether review output can be acted on by the business itself, or whether every flagged clause still routes back to legal.

Best for procurement and supplier contracts

Paper arrives on the counterparty's terms and has to be reviewed and negotiated against your standard positions. The question is whether the tool knows what your positions are, not just what the document says.

You do not need to arrive with anything prepared. We do the work with you.

What we handle

• Bringing your agreements across. You do not need to sort, clean or categorise anything first. We take what you have in whatever state it is in.
• Turning your positions into a playbook. Most teams have never written these down, and that is completely normal. We draw them out in a working session and turn them into something the system enforces.
• Your templates, formatting intact. They come over in Word with complex legal styling, numbering and clause formatting preserved, so nothing needs rebuilding.

What changes in week one

Review output comes back rated against your positions rather than a generic standard, so a commercial colleague can act on it directly instead of forwarding it to legal. Review, negotiation and drafting sit in one place, so the same tool covers the contract for as long as you need it.