GenieAI vs GC AI

These two products solve different shapes of contract problem. The questions below tell you which one you have, and where pricing and plans fit into the decision.

How GenieAI and GC AI pricing works

GenieAI and GC AI both use plan-based pricing rather than a single flat rate, so the number that matters is the one quoted for your team size and requirements. GC AI's public pricing is not always listed as a fixed figure, and reported plans have ranged from free or individual tiers for solo and smaller users up to custom enterprise pricing quoted on request, so treat any headline number as reported rather than confirmed and confirm current figures directly with the provider. Because reported team pricing and plan pricing can change year to year, ask what a plan costs per user per month or per year at your seat count before you commit, and request a demo so you can see the product against your own contracts.

GenieAI is priced per user across tiered plans, with custom plans for enterprise commercial teams that cover onboarding, playbook setup, and volume contract review. You can see current tiers and what each plan includes on the GenieAI pricing page. Many teams start on review alone and expand into drafting and negotiation once the product is embedded, so the plan you need can grow with the work rather than being locked in on day one.

Questions worth asking before you choose

• What is actually blocked, and for whom? If contract review time is the bottleneck for a commercial or sales team, the product needs to return risk-rated output a non-attorney can act on.
• Does it know your positions? A product that scores clauses against your own playbook is worth more than one that only summarizes what a document says.
• Where does the work happen? If your team drafts and redlines in Microsoft Word, a native editor or Microsoft Word add-in matters more than a separate workspace.
• What does the plan cost per user at your size? Get a quote for your actual seat count and contract volume rather than comparing headline tiers.
• What comes with the plan beyond the software? Check what support is available, whether that is attorney support, an onboarding contact, a Slack community, or a chat channel, and whether your data stays protected under a recognized standard such as ISO 27001.

Choose GenieAI if

• Review needs to be actionable by the business, not just accurate. GenieAI rates clauses red, amber or green against your own positions, so a commercial lead can see what to challenge without waiting for a lawyer to interpret it.
• You want the whole contract in one place, whether or not you draft today. GenieAI covers review and negotiation and drafting. Many teams start with review alone and add drafting later.
• Your team works in Word. The Word add-in puts review and drafting where the documents already live, with styling and numbering intact.
• A commercial, procurement or operations lead is doing the work, not a lawyer.
• You run project-based work where value concentrates in a few large agreements, as in construction, energy, mining, technology and real estate. A single missed indemnity or variation clause costs more than the whole review process.
• Where contract data sits matters. GenieAI is ISO/IEC 27001:2022 certified, set out on our security page.

Consider GC AI if

• GC AI is genuinely built for connecting the in-house legal function to the wider business, orchestrating legal workflows across systems like Slack, Salesforce, Jira and Asana so contract activity plugs into how the rest of the company already operates.

Where GenieAI is not the answer

• You are a law firm delivering billable client matters. GenieAI is built for the legal work a business does on its own contracts, including a firm's own commercial paperwork. It is not a matter-management or client-delivery tool.
• If your driving requirement is a broad legal-operations backbone that lives natively inside an existing stack of cloud storage and business tools, and you have the appetite for a multi-week IT-led rollout to get there, GC AI is shaped more closely to that programme than GenieAI is today.

Which alternative fits depends less on the feature list than on who is blocked.

Best for commercial and sales teams

The bottleneck is legal review time on standard sales agreements. GenieAI runs contract review inside guardrails legal sets, so legal sees the exceptions rather than every document. Pricing here usually tracks the number of commercial users who need seats, not the size of the legal team.

Best for in-house legal

The bottleneck is routine volume reaching a small in-house team. Teams at this stage typically compare GenieAI, GC AI, Ironclad, and Spellbook. The deciding question is usually whether review output can be acted on by the business itself, or whether every flagged clause still routes back to an attorney. Some products lean on solution attorney support and a shared skill library of easy prompts to fill gaps; GenieAI instead rates output against your own playbook so a commercial colleague can act without waiting on counsel.

Best for solo and smaller users

An individual or a very small team often needs a lighter product first. Some GC AI tiers have been reported to include free or individual options aimed at solo users, and a simple template or e-signature tool may serve well until contract volume rises. GenieAI is aimed at enterprise commercial teams, so it becomes the right choice once managing risk across volume, rather than getting a single document signed, is the real constraint.

Best for procurement and supplier contracts

Paper arrives on the counterparty's terms and has to be checked against your standard positions. The question is whether the product knows what your positions are, not just what the document says.

You do not need to arrive with anything prepared. We do the work with you.

What we handle

• Bringing your agreements across. You do not need to sort, clean or categorise anything first. We take what you have in whatever state it is in.
• Turning your positions into a playbook. Most teams have never written these down, and that is completely normal. We draw them out in a working session and turn them into something the system enforces.
• Your templates, formatting intact. They come over in Word with complex legal styling, numbering and clause formatting preserved, so nothing needs rebuilding.

What changes in week one

Review output comes back rated against your positions rather than a generic standard, so a commercial colleague can act on it directly instead of forwarding it to legal. Review, negotiation and drafting sit in one place, so the same tool covers the contract for as long as you need it.