Drafting an Energy Performance Contract: Key Clauses and Pitfalls

Drafting an Energy Performance Contract: Key Clauses and Pitfalls

An energy performance contract is a specialized agreement where one party, typically an energy service company (ESCO), commits to delivering measurable energy savings or efficiency improvements to a facility owner or operator. Unlike traditional service agreements, these contracts tie payment to actual performance outcomes, making them both attractive and complex. For business professionals managing these arrangements, understanding the essential clauses and common pitfalls is critical to protecting your organization's interests.

What Makes Energy Performance Contracts Different

Energy performance contracts shift risk in ways that standard vendor agreements do not. The ESCO typically finances upfront capital improvements, such as installing new HVAC systems, LED lighting, or building automation controls, and then recovers costs through a share of the energy savings achieved over time. This performance-based structure requires precise drafting to ensure both parties understand how savings will be measured, verified, and allocated.

The contract must clearly define baseline energy consumption, the methodology for calculating savings, and the duration of the performance period. Without these fundamentals in place, disputes over whether promised savings materialized become almost inevitable. The stakes are high, as these agreements often span 10 to 20 years and involve substantial capital investments.

Essential Clauses for Your Energy Performance Contract

Performance Guarantees and Measurement

The heart of any energy performance contract is the performance guarantee clause. This section should specify the exact energy savings or efficiency targets the ESCO commits to deliver, expressed in measurable units such as kilowatt-hours, therms, or percentage reductions from baseline consumption. Avoid vague language like "substantial savings" or "improved efficiency." Instead, require specific numerical targets with clear measurement protocols.

The measurement and verification (M&V) clause deserves equal attention. This provision establishes how energy savings will be calculated, what data will be collected, who will collect it, and how frequently measurements occur. Many contracts reference the International Performance Measurement and Verification Protocol (IPMVP) as a standard, but you should still detail the specific option being used and any modifications to the standard protocol.

Baseline Adjustments and Operating Conditions

Energy consumption varies based on factors beyond the ESCO's control, such as weather, occupancy levels, production schedules, and equipment additions or removals. Your contract needs adjustment provisions that account for these variables. A well-drafted baseline adjustment clause protects both parties by ensuring that the ESCO is not penalized for increased consumption driven by expanded operations, while also ensuring you are not credited with false savings from reduced building use.

Specify which factors trigger baseline adjustments, the methodology for making adjustments, and the approval process. Common adjustment triggers include changes in building square footage, operating hours, production volume, or weather-normalized degree days.

Payment Structure and Savings Allocation

The payment clause must clearly articulate how the ESCO will be compensated. Common structures include shared savings (where both parties split the savings according to a predetermined percentage), guaranteed savings (where the ESCO guarantees minimum savings and the owner keeps savings above that threshold), or a combination approach.

Detail the payment schedule, including any upfront fees, periodic payments tied to verified savings, and reconciliation procedures. Address what happens if savings fall short of guarantees. Does the ESCO pay the difference? Is there a cap on their liability? These provisions determine who ultimately bears the performance risk.

Scope of Work and Equipment Ownership

Clearly define what equipment and services the ESCO will provide. This section should include detailed specifications for all equipment to be installed, installation timelines, commissioning requirements, and acceptance testing procedures. Ambiguity here leads to disputes over whether the ESCO has fulfilled its obligations.

Address equipment ownership explicitly. In many energy performance contracts, the ESCO retains ownership of installed equipment until the contract term ends or until certain payment milestones are reached. Specify when title transfers, what happens to equipment if the contract terminates early, and who is responsible for maintenance, repairs, and insurance during the contract term.

Maintenance and Operations Obligations

Energy savings depend on proper equipment operation and maintenance. Your contract should specify each party's maintenance responsibilities in detail. Typically, the ESCO maintains the installed equipment to ensure it performs as guaranteed, while the facility owner continues maintaining existing building systems.

Define performance standards for maintenance, response times for repairs, and consequences for maintenance failures. If the owner's poor maintenance of existing systems undermines the ESCO's ability to deliver guaranteed savings, the contract should address how this affects the performance guarantee.

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

Inadequate Baseline Documentation

Many energy performance contract disputes stem from poorly documented baseline conditions. Before signing, ensure comprehensive energy audits are completed and baseline data is thoroughly documented. The contract should require the ESCO to provide detailed baseline reports that you can independently verify. Accepting vague or incomplete baseline data sets you up for disagreements about whether savings targets were actually met.

Overlooking Operational Changes

Facilities rarely operate identically over 15 or 20 years. Production lines change, buildings are expanded or renovated, and operating schedules shift. Contracts that fail to anticipate these changes create friction. Build in flexibility through well-defined adjustment mechanisms, but also include provisions requiring notice and documentation when operational changes occur. This protects both parties from unexpected impacts on energy consumption.

Weak Termination and Default Provisions

Energy performance contracts involve long-term commitments and significant capital investments. Your termination clause should address various scenarios: termination for convenience, termination for cause, and termination due to force majeure events. Specify the financial consequences of early termination, including how equipment ownership is handled and whether any breakup fees apply.

Default provisions should clearly define what constitutes a material breach, notice requirements, cure periods, and remedies. If the ESCO fails to deliver guaranteed savings, what are your options? Can you terminate without penalty? Are you entitled to damages? Similarly, if you fail to make payments or interfere with the ESCO's ability to perform, what remedies does the ESCO have?

When termination involves complex financial arrangements or equipment ownership transfers, consider referencing established frameworks. For example, if subcontractors are involved in installation or maintenance, a Main Contractor And Subcontractor Agreement may clarify responsibilities when the primary contract ends.

Insufficient Insurance and Indemnification

Energy performance contracts involve construction activities, equipment installation, and ongoing operations that create liability exposure. Require the ESCO to maintain adequate insurance coverage, including general liability, professional liability, and builders risk insurance during installation. Specify minimum coverage amounts and require you to be named as an additional insured.

Indemnification clauses should address who bears liability for different types of claims. Typically, the ESCO indemnifies you against claims arising from their work, equipment, or personnel, while you indemnify the ESCO against claims arising from your operations or pre-existing conditions. Ensure these provisions are mutual and appropriately scoped.

Ignoring Regulatory and Utility Incentive Complications

Energy efficiency projects often qualify for utility rebates, tax credits, or other incentives. Your contract should specify how these benefits are allocated. Does the ESCO receive them to offset project costs, or do you retain them? If incentives are denied or reduced, how does this affect the project economics and payment structure?

Similarly, address how regulatory changes affecting energy costs or efficiency standards impact the contract. If new regulations require additional equipment upgrades or change how energy savings are calculated, the contract should provide a mechanism for addressing these changes.

Protecting Your Interests Through Careful Drafting

Energy performance contracts offer significant benefits, but their complexity demands careful attention to contractual details. Focus on precision in defining performance metrics, establishing clear measurement protocols, and anticipating operational changes. Build in appropriate risk allocation through well-crafted indemnification, insurance, and termination provisions.

Before finalizing any energy performance contract, ensure you understand exactly what savings are guaranteed, how they will be measured, what happens if targets are not met, and what your obligations are throughout the contract term. Taking time to address these issues upfront prevents costly disputes and helps ensure your energy efficiency project delivers the financial and environmental benefits you expect.

The long-term nature of these agreements makes getting the contract right from the start essential. Unlike shorter-term service agreements, energy performance contracts lock you into a relationship spanning many years, making exit difficult and expensive. Invest the time and resources needed to negotiate clear, comprehensive terms that protect your organization while enabling the ESCO to perform effectively.

How do you measure and verify energy savings in a performance contract?

Measuring and verifying energy savings requires a clear baseline and ongoing monitoring protocol. Your energy performance contract should establish a baseline energy consumption level before improvements begin, using historical utility data and adjusted for variables like weather, occupancy, and operational changes. The contract must specify the measurement and verification (M&V) methodology, often following International Performance Measurement and Verification Protocol (IPMVP) standards. Define who conducts M&V activities, how frequently data is collected, and what equipment is used. Include provisions for independent audits if disputes arise. Payment terms should tie directly to verified savings, protecting your organization from paying for undelivered results. Clear M&V clauses reduce ambiguity and ensure both parties understand how performance will be assessed throughout the contract term.

What happens if guaranteed energy savings are not achieved in your contract?

If guaranteed energy savings fall short, your energy performance contract should clearly define the remedies available. Typically, the energy service company must compensate you for the shortfall through direct payments or credits. Some contracts include performance bonds or bank guarantees to secure these obligations. Well-drafted contracts specify the measurement period, calculation methodology, and dispute resolution procedures. You may also negotiate termination rights if underperformance persists beyond a defined threshold. Without clear remediation clauses, you risk bearing the financial burden of unmet savings projections. Always ensure your contract includes detailed verification protocols, third-party audit rights, and enforceable penalties. These protections help align vendor incentives with your operational goals and provide recourse when performance guarantees are not met.

How do you structure payment terms based on energy performance guarantees?

Payment terms in an energy performance contract should directly tie compensation to verified energy savings. Consider a tiered structure where the service provider receives a base payment for installation and commissioning, followed by performance-based payments calculated as a percentage of actual energy cost reductions measured against an agreed baseline. Include clear measurement and verification protocols, specifying who conducts audits and how frequently. Withholding a portion of payments until performance targets are consistently met over a defined period protects your organization. Address remedies for underperformance, such as payment reductions or required corrective actions at the provider's expense. If substantial upfront investment is involved, consider securing an Open Bank Guarantee to mitigate financial risk. Ensure payment milestones align with verification cycles, typically quarterly or annually, and define dispute resolution mechanisms for contested performance data.

Genie AI: The Global Contracting Standard

At Genie AI, we help founders and business leaders create, review, and manage tailored legal documents - without needing a legal team. Whether you're drafting documents, negotiating contracts, reviewing terms, or scaling operations whilst maintaining a lean team, Genie's AI-powered platform puts trusted legal workflows at your fingertips. Try Genie today and move faster, with legal clarity and confidence.