Trademark Concurrent Use Agreement Template for the United States

Generate a bespoke document

What is a Trademark Concurrent Use Agreement?

The Trademark Concurrent Use Agreement is essential when two or more businesses need to legally coexist while using similar or identical trademarks. This typically occurs when different companies have developed trademark rights in distinct geographic areas or markets. Under U.S. trademark law, this agreement provides a framework for peaceful coexistence, defining territorial boundaries, usage rights, and quality control measures. It helps prevent costly litigation and provides clarity on each party's rights and obligations while ensuring compliance with federal and state trademark regulations.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is a Trademark Concurrent Use Agreement legally binding under federal law in the United States?

Yes, a properly executed Trademark Concurrent Use Agreement is legally binding under U.S. federal trademark law, specifically governed by the Lanham Act (15 U.S.C. §§ 1051 et seq.). The agreement creates enforceable obligations between parties regarding territorial boundaries and usage parameters for similar trademarks. Courts will enforce these agreements as long as they comply with Section 2(d) requirements and don't violate public policy.

Can I still protect my trademark rights if there's no written Concurrent Use Agreement?

Without a written agreement, trademark disputes typically result in costly federal court litigation under the Lanham Act. The senior user (first to use the mark) generally has superior rights, but geographic limitations may apply based on actual use areas. Missing agreements often lead to injunctions, damages, or forced rebranding, making proactive concurrent use agreements much more cost-effective than litigation.

How does a Concurrent Use Agreement differ from a trademark coexistence agreement?

A Concurrent Use Agreement specifically addresses situations where parties seek federal trademark registration despite conflicting marks, often involving USPTO concurrent registration procedures under Section 2(d). Coexistence agreements are broader arrangements that may involve unregistered marks or different trademark classes. Concurrent use agreements have stricter territorial and usage restrictions required for federal registration approval.

How long does it typically take to negotiate and finalize a Trademark Concurrent Use Agreement?

Negotiating a Concurrent Use Agreement typically takes 2-6 months, depending on the complexity of territorial boundaries and market overlap. The process involves trademark searches, usage history analysis, and detailed territorial mapping. If concurrent USPTO registration is sought, add another 12-18 months for the federal registration process, as these applications require extensive evidence and often involve opposition proceedings.

Must Concurrent Use Agreements include specific territorial boundaries to be valid under federal law?

Yes, federal trademark law requires Concurrent Use Agreements to include precise geographic boundaries and clear usage parameters. Under TMEP guidelines, territorial restrictions must be specific enough to prevent consumer confusion and must reflect actual areas of trademark use. Vague geographic descriptions can invalidate the agreement and prevent successful concurrent registration with the USPTO.

Which common mistakes invalidate Trademark Concurrent Use Agreements under the Lanham Act?

Common fatal mistakes include failing to define precise territorial boundaries, omitting usage restrictions that prevent consumer confusion, and not addressing online commerce territories. Many agreements also fail because parties don't properly document their prior use dates and geographic areas, which are essential for Section 33(b)(5) prior use defenses and concurrent registration eligibility.

Can state trademark laws override federal Concurrent Use Agreements?

No, properly executed federal Concurrent Use Agreements under the Lanham Act generally preempt conflicting state trademark laws due to federal supremacy. However, state unfair competition laws and common law trademark rights may still apply in areas not covered by the federal agreement. The agreement should address both federal registration rights and state law considerations to provide comprehensive protection.

Reviewed by

Swetha Meenal

Legal Engineer, GenieAI

Swetha Meenal profile photo

A lawyer, legal researcher and legal tech founder, Swetha has built AI products deployed inside Tier 1 firms and enterprises. She ensures GenieAI's alignment with the latest regulation and executes testing on the legal robustness of Genie output.

Reviewed by

Imad Mohammed Nazar

Legal Engineer, GenieAI

Imad Mohammed Nazar profile photo

A Skadden-trained M&A lawyer, Imad advised on cross-border transactions and contractual risk before moving into legal AI. He reviews GenieAI's output for compliance and enforceability across our 150+ supported jurisdictions, as well as facilitating external benchmarking.

Jurisdiction

United States

Publisher

GenieAI

Sector

Business

Cost

Free to use

Last updated

About the Trademark Concurrent Use Agreement

When multiple businesses have legitimate claims to similar or identical trademarks, a Trademark Concurrent Use Agreement provides the legal framework necessary to avoid conflicts and establish clear usage rights. Under United States trademark law, this agreement allows parties to coexist peacefully while protecting their respective trademark interests and maintaining compliance with federal regulations.

When do you need this document?

You need a Trademark Concurrent Use Agreement when your business operates in a different geographic area or market sector than another company using a similar trademark. This situation commonly arises when businesses develop trademark rights independently in separate regions before either party seeks federal registration. The agreement becomes essential when both parties want to continue using their marks without infringing on each other's rights. It's also necessary when the USPTO requires concurrent use proceedings as part of the federal registration process, or when businesses want to proactively resolve potential trademark disputes before they escalate into costly litigation.

Key legal considerations

Your agreement must clearly define the scope of each party's trademark rights, including specific geographic boundaries, field of use limitations, and quality control standards. The territorial divisions should be precise and enforceable, often based on existing market presence or business operations. Quality control provisions are crucial under the Lanham Act, as they prevent trademark abandonment and maintain the distinctiveness of the marks. You should also address expansion rights, determining how each party can grow their business within agreed parameters. The agreement must include provisions for monitoring compliance, handling violations, and resolving future disputes. Additionally, consider including termination clauses that specify what happens if one party violates the agreement or ceases to use their trademark rights.

Legal requirements in United States

Under the Lanham Act, concurrent use agreements must comply with federal trademark law principles, particularly Section 2(d) requirements for concurrent registration. If seeking USPTO registration, your agreement must demonstrate that concurrent use will not cause consumer confusion in the marketplace. The USPTO may require specific geographic or commercial limitations as conditions for allowing concurrent registrations. Your agreement should align with USPTO policies outlined in the Trademark Manual of Examining Procedure (TMEP), particularly regarding territorial restrictions and quality control standards. State trademark laws may also apply, especially for businesses operating within specific jurisdictions. The agreement must be enforceable under contract law principles and should include proper legal notices and registration requirements. Documentation of prior use and good faith adoption of the trademarks strengthens the agreement's legal foundation and supports any future USPTO proceedings.

GOVERNING LAW

Applicable law

This Trademark Concurrent Use Agreement is drafted to comply with United States law. Key legislation includes:

Lanham Act: Primary federal trademark law (15 U.S.C. �� 1051 et seq.) governing trademark registration and protection, particularly Section 2(d) on concurrent registration, Section 22 on constructive notice, and Section 33(b)(5) on prior use defenses

TMEP: Trademark Manual of Examining Procedure - comprehensive guide for USPTO trademark examination policies and procedures relevant to concurrent use agreements

USPTO Rules: 37 CFR Part 2 - Rules of Practice in Trademark Cases that govern trademark registration procedures and concurrent use requirements

State Trademark Laws: Individual state statutes governing trademark rights and protection within state jurisdictions, including state-specific unfair competition and consumer protection provisions

Common Law Principles: Uncodified legal principles including common law trademark rights, contract law fundamentals, and geographic scope considerations that affect concurrent use agreements

Paris Convention: International treaty providing trademark protection across member countries, relevant when concurrent use agreement has international implications

Madrid Protocol: International treaty system allowing trademark owners to file one application to protect their marks in multiple countries, pertinent for international concurrent use considerations

TRIPS Agreement: Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights, establishing minimum standards for intellectual property regulation in WTO member countries

Geographic Territory Provisions: Legal requirements for clearly defining and enforcing geographic boundaries in concurrent use agreements

Quality Control Requirements: Legal standards for maintaining trademark quality and consistency across different users in concurrent use situations

Dispute Resolution Framework: Legal requirements and options for establishing dispute resolution mechanisms in concurrent use agreements

Genie's Security Promise

Genie is the safest place to draft. Here's how we prioritise your privacy and security.

Your data is private:

We do not train on your data; Genie's AI improves independently

All data stored on Genie is private to your organisation

Your documents are protected:

Your documents are protected by ultra-secure 256-bit encryption

We are ISO27001 certified, so your data is secure

Organizational security:

You retain IP ownership of your documents and their information

You have full control over your data and who gets to see it