Unilateral Arbitration Clause Template for the United States

Generate a bespoke document

What is a Unilateral Arbitration Clause?

The Unilateral Arbitration Clause is designed for use in situations where one party wishes to maintain flexibility in dispute resolution while requiring the other party to proceed through arbitration. Common in U.S. commercial relationships, particularly in business-to-consumer and employer-employee contexts, this clause must comply with the Federal Arbitration Act and applicable state laws. The clause typically specifies the scope of arbitrable disputes, arbitration procedures, and the process for selecting arbitrators.

Frequently Asked Questions

Are unilateral arbitration clauses legally enforceable in the United States?

Yes, unilateral arbitration clauses are generally enforceable in the United States under the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA). However, courts may scrutinize these clauses more carefully for unconscionability since they create an imbalanced dispute resolution process. The clause must still meet basic FAA requirements and comply with Supreme Court precedents like AT&T Mobility v. Concepcion to remain valid.

Can I still go to court if my contract has a unilateral arbitration clause?

It depends on which party you are in the contract. If you're the party bound by the arbitration requirement, you generally cannot go to court and must resolve disputes through arbitration. However, if you're the party with the option to choose, you can select either arbitration or traditional court litigation for each dispute that arises.

How is a unilateral arbitration clause different from a mutual arbitration clause?

A unilateral arbitration clause binds only one party to arbitration while giving the other party the choice between arbitration and court. In contrast, a mutual arbitration clause requires both parties to resolve all disputes through arbitration only. Unilateral clauses are more likely to face legal challenges for being unconscionable due to their one-sided nature.

How long does it typically take to create a unilateral arbitration clause?

A basic unilateral arbitration clause can be drafted in 1-2 hours, but comprehensive clauses addressing enforceability concerns may take several days to complete. The timeline depends on the complexity of your business relationship, jurisdiction-specific requirements, and whether you need legal review. Rushing this process often leads to unenforceable clauses that get struck down in court.

Can a judge throw out my unilateral arbitration clause for being unfair?

Yes, courts can invalidate unilateral arbitration clauses if they find them unconscionable or fundamentally unfair. Judges look at factors like the imbalance of bargaining power, lack of consideration for the bound party, and whether the clause is procedurally or substantively unconscionable. Including mutual benefits or reasonable procedural safeguards can help prevent invalidation.

Must unilateral arbitration clauses comply with specific Federal Arbitration Act requirements?

Yes, unilateral arbitration clauses must meet all standard FAA requirements including written form, involvement of interstate commerce, and basic procedural fairness. They must also comply with Supreme Court precedents and cannot completely bar statutory claims or class actions in ways that conflict with federal law. State law unconscionability doctrines may also apply as additional constraints.

Why do courts sometimes refuse to enforce incomplete unilateral arbitration clauses?

Courts may refuse enforcement when clauses lack essential elements like arbitration procedures, arbitrator selection methods, or governing rules. Missing provisions create uncertainty about dispute resolution mechanics and may indicate the clause wasn't seriously negotiated. Incomplete clauses also make it difficult to determine if both parties understood their rights and obligations under the agreement.

Reviewed by

Swetha Meenal

Legal Engineer, GenieAI

Swetha Meenal profile photo

A lawyer, legal researcher and legal tech founder, Swetha has built AI products deployed inside Tier 1 firms and enterprises. She ensures GenieAI's alignment with the latest regulation and executes testing on the legal robustness of Genie output.

Reviewed by

Imad Mohammed Nazar

Legal Engineer, GenieAI

Imad Mohammed Nazar profile photo

A Skadden-trained M&A lawyer, Imad advised on cross-border transactions and contractual risk before moving into legal AI. He reviews GenieAI's output for compliance and enforceability across our 150+ supported jurisdictions, as well as facilitating external benchmarking.

Jurisdiction

United States

Publisher

GenieAI

Sector

Business

Cost

Free to use

Last updated

About the Unilateral Arbitration Clause

A unilateral arbitration clause creates an asymmetric dispute resolution framework where one party retains the right to pursue litigation while requiring the other party to resolve disputes exclusively through arbitration. Under United States law, these clauses are governed by the Federal Arbitration Act and must meet specific enforceability standards established by federal courts.

When do you need this document?

You typically need a unilateral arbitration clause when drafting consumer contracts, employment agreements, or business-to-business contracts where maintaining litigation flexibility is strategically important. Companies often include these clauses in credit card agreements, cell phone contracts, and software licenses to preserve their right to sue customers for unpaid debts while requiring customers to arbitrate their claims. Employers frequently use unilateral arbitration clauses in employment contracts to retain the ability to seek injunctive relief in court while requiring employees to arbitrate workplace disputes. Financial institutions commonly incorporate these provisions in loan agreements to maintain foreclosure rights while limiting borrower litigation options.

Key legal considerations

The enforceability of your unilateral arbitration clause depends on several critical factors under federal law. The clause must provide adequate consideration to the party bound by arbitration, often achieved through the underlying contract's mutual benefits. You must ensure the arbitration procedures are fair and accessible, including reasonable cost allocation and neutral arbitrator selection processes. The scope of arbitrable disputes should be clearly defined to avoid judicial challenges about what claims fall under the clause. Class action waiver provisions, while generally enforceable under AT&T Mobility v. Concepcion, must be carefully drafted to avoid state law unconscionability challenges. Your clause should include delegation provisions that require arbitrators, rather than courts, to determine arbitrability disputes, as established in Rent-A-Center West v. Jackson.

Legal requirements in United States

Under the Federal Arbitration Act, your unilateral arbitration clause must involve interstate commerce to trigger federal preemption of conflicting state laws. The clause cannot be unconscionably one-sided, though some asymmetry is permissible if justified by legitimate business needs. You must specify the arbitration rules that will govern proceedings, such as American Arbitration Association or JAMS procedures. Notice requirements for initiating arbitration must be clearly stated, including time limits for filing claims. The clause should address arbitrator qualifications, hearing locations, and discovery procedures to ensure due process compliance. Following Epic Systems v. Lewis, employment-related unilateral arbitration clauses with class action waivers are generally enforceable, but you must still comply with National Labor Relations Act requirements regarding collective action rights.

GOVERNING LAW

Applicable law

This Unilateral Arbitration Clause is drafted to comply with United States law. Key legislation includes:

Federal Arbitration Act (FAA): Primary federal law (9 U.S.C. ยงยง 1-16) that establishes validity and enforceability of arbitration agreements, sets basic requirements for arbitration clauses, and provides framework for enforcement of arbitration awards

AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion (2011): Key Supreme Court case establishing that the Federal Arbitration Act preempts state laws that prohibit contracts from disallowing class-wide arbitration

Epic Systems Corp. v. Lewis (2018): Supreme Court case upholding the enforceability of class action waivers in employment arbitration agreements

Rent-A-Center West v. Jackson (2010): Supreme Court decision establishing that challenges to the validity of an arbitration agreement must be specifically directed at the delegation provision

State Arbitration Laws: Individual state laws that govern arbitration proceedings and may impose additional requirements or restrictions on arbitration agreements

Unconscionability Doctrine: Legal principle that may void contract provisions that are unreasonably favorable to one party and unfairly disadvantage the other party

Mutuality of Obligation: Legal principle requiring that both parties to a contract must be bound by their agreements, particularly relevant in unilateral arbitration clauses

Notice Requirements: Legal obligations to provide clear and conspicuous notice of arbitration provisions to all parties involved in the agreement

Consumer Protection Laws: Federal and state laws that protect consumer rights and may affect the enforceability of arbitration clauses in consumer contracts

Employment Law Considerations: Specific legal requirements and restrictions that apply to arbitration agreements in employment contracts

Genie's Security Promise

Genie is the safest place to draft. Here's how we prioritise your privacy and security.

Your data is private:

We do not train on your data; Genie's AI improves independently

All data stored on Genie is private to your organisation

Your documents are protected:

Your documents are protected by ultra-secure 256-bit encryption

We are ISO27001 certified, so your data is secure

Organizational security:

You retain IP ownership of your documents and their information

You have full control over your data and who gets to see it