Drafting Energy Performance Contracts: Key Clauses and Risk Allocation

Drafting Energy Performance Contracts: Key Clauses and Risk Allocation

Energy performance contracts have become essential tools for organizations seeking to reduce energy costs while transferring technical and financial risk to specialized service providers. These agreements allow businesses to upgrade facilities, install new equipment, and implement energy-saving measures without upfront capital expenditure. The provider finances the improvements and gets repaid through the resulting energy savings over time.

For commercial teams and operations professionals managing these arrangements, understanding the core contractual framework is critical. Poor drafting can lead to disputes over savings calculations, measurement protocols, and responsibility when projected results fall short. This guide walks through the essential clauses and risk allocation strategies that protect your organization while enabling successful energy efficiency projects.

Defining Performance Obligations and Measurement

The foundation of any energy performance contract is a clear definition of what constitutes performance. Unlike traditional procurement where you pay for equipment or services rendered, performance contracts tie payment to measurable outcomes. This requires precision in several areas.

First, establish the baseline energy consumption against which savings will be measured. This baseline should account for variables like weather, occupancy levels, production volume, and operating hours. Without proper adjustment factors, you may find yourself paying for savings that result from reduced business activity rather than genuine efficiency improvements.

Second, specify the measurement and verification protocol. Industry standards like the International Performance Measurement and Verification Protocol provide frameworks, but your contract should detail exactly which meters will be used, how frequently readings occur, who performs the verification, and how data gets reported. Ambiguity here creates disputes later.

Third, define the guaranteed savings or performance threshold. Will the provider guarantee a specific percentage reduction in energy use, a dollar amount of savings, or achievement of certain operational parameters? Each approach carries different risk profiles. Percentage reductions protect against energy price fluctuations but may not deliver expected financial returns. Dollar guarantees provide budget certainty but expose you to price volatility.

Payment Structure and Savings Reconciliation

Payment mechanisms in performance contracts typically follow one of several models. In a shared savings structure, both parties split the realized savings according to a predetermined formula. This aligns incentives but requires ongoing measurement and reconciliation. In a guaranteed savings model, the provider commits to a minimum savings level and makes up any shortfall, while you pay a fixed amount regardless of actual performance.

Your contract should specify the reconciliation process in detail. How often will actual savings be calculated against projections? Monthly reconciliation provides quick feedback but increases administrative burden. Annual reconciliation reduces overhead but delays corrective action when performance lags. Many contracts use quarterly periods as a middle ground.

Address what happens when guaranteed savings are not achieved. Does the provider pay the difference immediately, or does the shortfall carry forward to future periods? Some contracts include a cumulative approach where performance is measured over the entire contract term, allowing strong years to offset weaker ones. Others require period-by-period true-ups to ensure consistent performance.

Consider including provisions for changes in energy prices, utility rate structures, or regulatory requirements that affect savings calculations. Without these adjustment mechanisms, external factors beyond either party's control can make the contract unworkable.

Equipment Ownership and Maintenance Responsibilities

Energy performance contracts often involve significant equipment installation. Clear allocation of ownership, maintenance obligations, and replacement responsibility prevents future conflicts. Determine whether equipment ownership transfers to you immediately, at contract end, or remains with the provider throughout the term.

Maintenance responsibilities directly impact performance. The contract should specify routine maintenance schedules, response times for repairs, and standards for replacement parts. If the provider handles maintenance, define what constitutes acceptable performance and remedies for failures. If you retain maintenance responsibility, understand that poor maintenance may void performance guarantees.

Equipment warranties deserve separate attention. Manufacturer warranties may cover defects, but who pursues warranty claims? Who bears the cost of downtime during repairs? Coordinate warranty terms with performance guarantee periods to avoid gaps in coverage.

Term, Termination, and Exit Provisions

Performance contracts typically run for extended periods, often ten to twenty years, to allow sufficient time for savings to repay the initial investment. This long duration makes termination provisions particularly important. Standard termination rights for material breach should be supplemented with specific provisions addressing performance failures.

Define what constitutes material underperformance. Is it a single period of missed targets, or must the provider fail to meet guarantees for multiple consecutive periods? Include cure periods that allow the provider to investigate and remedy performance issues before you can terminate.

Address the financial consequences of early termination. If you terminate for convenience, you likely owe the provider the unamortized balance of their investment plus a termination fee. If the provider defaults, you may be entitled to damages but must still address any outstanding financing obligations. A Termination Letter With Notice Period can help formalize the exit process when the time comes.

Consider assignment and succession provisions. What happens if your organization is acquired or if the provider is sold? Can either party assign the contract without consent? These questions become critical in long-term arrangements.

Risk Allocation and Indemnification

Effective risk allocation matches responsibility with control. The provider should bear risks related to equipment performance, installation quality, and achievement of guaranteed savings, as these fall within their expertise and control. You should retain risks related to facility operations, changes in use patterns, and compliance with your directions.

Indemnification clauses should reflect this allocation. The provider should indemnify you against claims arising from their work, equipment defects, and failure to comply with applicable codes and standards. You should indemnify the provider against claims arising from your negligence, pre-existing conditions, or interference with their work.

Insurance requirements must align with the risk profile. Require the provider to maintain adequate general liability, professional liability, and workers compensation coverage. If the provider finances the project, they may require you to maintain property insurance covering the installed equipment. Verify that insurance certificates name appropriate additional insureds and include waiver of subrogation provisions.

Force majeure provisions take on special importance in long-term performance contracts. Define which events excuse performance and what remedies apply. Does a force majeure event suspend the savings guarantee, extend the contract term, or provide a termination right? Consider whether extended force majeure periods should allow either party to exit without penalty.

Change Management and Flexibility

Over a multi-year term, your facility needs and operations will evolve. Build in mechanisms to accommodate change without renegotiating the entire agreement. Include procedures for adding or removing equipment, adjusting the baseline for significant operational changes, and modifying performance targets when circumstances warrant.

Define what constitutes a qualifying change that triggers baseline adjustment. Major changes like adding a production line or significantly extending operating hours clearly affect energy use. Minor changes should not require constant recalculation. Establish thresholds, perhaps based on percentage impact on total energy consumption, that determine when adjustments occur.

Address how new energy efficiency opportunities discovered during the term will be handled. Does the provider have a right of first refusal for additional projects? Can you implement your own improvements without affecting the existing guarantees? These provisions prevent conflicts when new technologies or opportunities emerge.

Dispute Resolution and Performance Monitoring

Given the technical complexity and long duration of performance contracts, disputes are common. Establish a tiered dispute resolution process that addresses technical disagreements before they escalate to legal action. Many contracts require disputes over measurement or savings calculations to be submitted to a mutually agreed technical expert before proceeding to arbitration or litigation.

Regular performance reporting and review meetings help identify issues early. Require monthly or quarterly reports showing actual versus projected savings, equipment performance metrics, and maintenance activities. Schedule periodic review meetings where both parties assess performance trends and address concerns.

Consider including a formal governance structure for longer contracts. A joint steering committee with representatives from both organizations can oversee performance, approve changes, and resolve operational issues before they become contractual disputes.

Regulatory Compliance and Incentive Capture

Energy projects often qualify for utility rebates, tax credits, or other incentives. Your contract should clearly allocate these benefits and assign responsibility for pursuing them. Typically, the provider captures incentives as they reduce the project cost, but verify this aligns with your tax and accounting treatment.

Address compliance with evolving energy regulations and reporting requirements. As jurisdictions implement new energy benchmarking, disclosure, or performance standards, determine who bears the cost of compliance and whether regulatory changes affect performance guarantees.

Environmental attributes like renewable energy credits or carbon offsets may have value. Specify who owns these attributes and whether they can be monetized separately from the energy savings.

Integrating with Broader Contracting Frameworks

Energy performance contracts often exist within larger facility management or construction arrangements. If you are working with a general contractor who will coordinate with the energy services provider, a Main Contractor And Subcontractor Agreement helps clarify the relationship and flow-down of obligations.

When performance contracts involve significant upfront financing, providers may require security in the form of guarantees or liens. Understanding the implications of financial instruments like an Open Bank Guarantee helps you evaluate the total cost and risk of the arrangement.

Energy performance contracts offer significant benefits but require careful attention to contractual detail. By clearly defining performance metrics, establishing fair risk allocation, building in flexibility for changing conditions, and creating robust dispute resolution mechanisms, you can structure agreements that deliver sustained value while protecting your organization from common pitfalls. The investment in thorough contract drafting pays dividends throughout the long life of these arrangements.

How do you measure and verify energy savings in performance contracts?

Measuring and verifying energy savings in performance contracts requires establishing a clear baseline of pre-project energy consumption, then comparing it to post-installation usage under similar operating conditions. The International Performance Measurement and Verification Protocol (IPMVP) provides industry-standard methods, including direct metering, utility bill analysis, and computer simulations. Your contract should specify the measurement methodology, frequency of data collection, and acceptable variance thresholds. Independent third-party verification often reduces disputes and builds trust between parties. Additionally, contracts should address how to adjust for changes in weather, occupancy, or operational hours that affect energy use. Clear documentation requirements and reporting schedules help ensure transparency. If your project involves subcontractors installing equipment, consider reviewing a Main Contractor And Subcontractor Agreement to clarify verification responsibilities across all parties.

What happens when guaranteed energy savings aren't achieved in your contract?

When guaranteed energy savings fall short, your contract should clearly define the remedy mechanisms. Typically, the energy service company must compensate you for the shortfall through direct payments, credits, or additional performance improvements at no extra cost. Well-drafted performance contracts include measurement and verification protocols to establish baseline consumption and track actual savings. If disputes arise over whether savings targets were met, your contract should specify resolution procedures, such as third-party audits or arbitration. Some agreements allow termination rights if underperformance persists beyond a cure period. To protect your interests, ensure your contract addresses liability caps, insurance requirements, and whether the provider offers financial guarantees or performance bonds to secure their obligations throughout the contract term.

How do you allocate risk between ESCOs and facility owners in performance-based agreements?

Risk allocation in performance-based agreements typically balances measurement risk, operational risk, and financial risk between energy service companies (ESCOs) and facility owners. ESCOs generally assume responsibility for equipment performance and energy savings guarantees, while facility owners retain operational control and maintenance obligations. Clear baseline measurements, savings calculation methodologies, and performance verification protocols protect both parties. Financial guarantees, such as an Open Bank Guarantee, can secure the ESCO's commitments. Contracts should address force majeure events, changes in facility usage, and utility rate fluctuations. Indemnification clauses define liability for equipment failure, missed savings targets, or third-party claims. Termination provisions outline exit rights and payment obligations if either party fails to meet contractual obligations, ensuring fair remedies when performance expectations are not met.

Genie AI: The Global Contracting Standard

At Genie AI, we help founders and business leaders create, review, and manage tailored legal documents - without needing a legal team. Whether you're drafting documents, negotiating contracts, reviewing terms, or scaling operations whilst maintaining a lean team, Genie's AI-powered platform puts trusted legal workflows at your fingertips. Try Genie today and move faster, with legal clarity and confidence.