Genie AI vs LEAP

❓ Limited AI capabilities compared to AI-native platforms; focused more on automation than true AI-powered drafting and review

Advanced algorithms that learn from legal documents to automate and enhance contract analysis, drafting, and review processes.

❓ Template-based document generation rather than AI-assisted drafting; automated document assembly from pre-built forms

Does the platform offer a streamlined system for creating full-length legal documents from scratch using AI-powered suggestions, templates, and clause libraries?

❓ Basic document review capabilities but lacks AI-powered analysis and flagging

Can the platform run a systematic analysis of legal documents to identify risks, obligations, and key terms while suggesting necessary changes and improvements?

✅ Strong document automation capabilities using pre-built templates with merge fields and conditional logic

Can the platform be used to combine pre-approved legal content and templates to quickly create new contracts and legal documents?

❓ No true AI-powered document editing; relies on traditional template-based approaches

Does the platform enhance document editing by suggesting improvements, corrections, and alternative language in the document, in real-time?

❓ Limited native legal research capabilities; relies on integrations with third-party providers

Does the platform directly connect to legal databases and precedents that enable research and citation while drafting documents?

❓ Basic document comparison but lacks specialized AI negotiation tools

Can the platform help track, manage and respond to contract changes and counterparty requests during negotiations?

✅ OCR capabilities for document scanning and data extraction in certain workflows

Can the platform automatically convert scanned documents and images into searchable, editable text while pulling out key information and data points?

❓ Client portal for document sharing, but limited real-time collaboration compared to modern document editors

Does the platform enable multiple team members to work together on contracts in real-time, with comments, tracked changes, and version control?

✅ Comprehensive workflow management for matters with task tracking and deadline management

Does the platform automate routine legal tasks and document processes through customizable rules and triggers, reducing manual work and streamlining operations?

✅ Full matter management including document storage, versioning, and retrieval

Does the platform house a centralized system to store, track, and monitor contracts throughout their lifecycle, from creation to expiry?

✅ Extensive business intelligence reporting on firm performance, financials, and matter progress

Can the platform track, measure, and visualize contract data, or team usage data to provide real-time ROI figures, actionable business and individual performance insights?

✅ Can build and maintain private clause libraries within the system

A secure repository where organizations store and manage their own frequently-used contract clauses and legal language.

❓ No community template library; uses jurisdiction-specific pre-built forms

A shared collection of pre-built legal document templates, contributed to and accessible by all users of the platform.

✅ Extensive professionally-drafted templates and ability to create private template libraries

A secure collection of your organization's customized document templates, accessible only to authorized team members within your company.

Is the platform accessible on the cloud and/or can it be installed directly on-premises, or using company servers?

✅ Integrates with Microsoft Word for document creation and editing

A seamless integration with Microsoft Word that allows users to draft and edit documents directly within the familiar Word interface.

❓ Limited third-party storage integration; primarily uses its own cloud storage

Does the platform connect with popular cloud storage platforms to access and manage documents directly within the system?

✅ Integrates with Microsoft Office, accounting systems, payment processors, and legal research tools

Can you connect with your existing software via standardized APIs and/or custom integrations?

✅ Supports complex legal styling and formatting in document assembly

Can you automatically apply and maintain professional legal document formatting, including numbering, cross-references, and hierarchical styles when editing, and when importing/exporting to MS Word?

✅ Enterprise-grade security with encryption in transit and at rest

Does data remain encrypted during transmission and storage, protecting sensitive information at every stage of handling?

✅ ISO27001 certified with regular security audits

Which recognized security certifications and regulatory standards can verify the robustness of the platform's data protection measures?

✅ Region-specific data storage with strong privacy controls

Can the customer own their own data, or can the platform use it and process it, to train their Legal AI models for example?

✅ Multi-factor authentication and single sign-on capabilities

Does the platform offer secure login options including API keys, 2FA, tokens, and/or single sign-on to manage system access?

✅ Granular user permissions and access controls for matters and documents

Can you manage who can view, edit, and share documents through customizable user roles and restrictions?

✅ Compliant with legal industry regulatory requirements including GDPR, CCPA

Does the platform comply with international data protection requirements including GDPR, CCPA, and other regional privacy laws?

✅ Multiple support channels including phone, email, and chat

Is there a dedicated support team providing assistance through multiple channels including live chat, email, and phone, with defined response time commitments?

❓ Comprehensive but requires significant time investment for data migration and training

Is there a structured process to get teams up and running with personalized training, data migration, and system configuration support?

Pilot: ❓ Limited pilot options; typically moves directly to implementationImplementation Timeline: ❓ Typically 1-2 months from purchase to full implementation

If you do go down the sales process (not self-serve) then most want a quick and tailored pilot, followed by rapid implementation.

❓ Subscription-based pricing starting at approximately $120-$250 per user per month depending on region and practice areas

Subscription fees, usage limits, and additional costs for accessing and using the platform's features.

Self-serve: ❌ No immediate self-serve option; requires formal onboarding processSales: ❓ Typically 4-8 weeks from purchase to full implementation

Self-serve caters to those who want to 'try before they buy' and don't enjoy the sales process.

❓ Some users report steep learning curve, complex interface, and cost concerns

A collection of verified 3rd-party customer reviews documenting any known technical issues.

❓ Metrics focus on overall practice efficiency rather than specific drafting time savings

Look for firm metrics, tied to the specific tasks you're looking to drive efficiencies within.